Begin with your account
Open a case
Describe what happened in your own words, name the other party and identify the outcome you want to discuss.
How it works
Follow one deposit dispute as two different accounts become a structured case, a clear negotiation and a documented agreement.
Case AR-1042 · Deposit repayment
The process does not ask the parties to agree too early. It creates enough structure for useful differences—and possible common ground—to become visible.
Begin
01–02Open one case and give the other party a distinct place to respond.
Begin with your account
Describe what happened in your own words, name the other party and identify the outcome you want to discuss.
Bring in the other account
The other party receives a clear invitation and a separate place to respond. Their account is not forced into yours.
Each party keeps a distinct account inside one case.
Structure
03–04Separate the disagreement into issues, then connect the material that explains them.
Make the difference visible
Agreed facts, disputed facts, claims and open questions are separated so everyone can see where attention is needed.
Keep context attached
Agreements, invoices, photographs, messages and reports remain connected to the issue they help explain.
Work through it
05–06Keep discussion in context and turn possible outcomes into comparable proposals.
Keep discussion in the case
Case-related discussion stays beside the record instead of becoming another disconnected email or message thread.
Negotiate in clear versions
Offers and counteroffers show amounts, terms and changes explicitly. A proposal remains understandable later.
Resolve
07–08Bring in help when it is useful, then preserve the terms both parties accept.
Add help without starting over
A mediator can enter an already-organized case and review the parties, issues, evidence and proposal history.
Context is ready before the first conversation.
Make the outcome legible
Accepted terms become a clear resolution record showing what was agreed, by whom and when.
Continuity matters
The invitation, evidence, discussion, proposals and agreement stay in one chronology. A later step does not lose the context created earlier.
A clear next step
Begin with what happened. The shared case can become more complete as each party responds.